Posted by
JDHoldem on Friday, November 02, 2007 10:53:36 PM
It seems that the Los Angeles Times is "supposedly" sitting on a steamy sex scandal involving a major Presidential candidate. According to the rumor, this is a well-known open secret among the Washington Press Corp. Apparently The Times is cogitating over the ethical issues involved with the story and the impact it would have on the election -- even though they apparently had no such reluctance concerning Arnold and sex stories about him -- releasing stories only days before the gubanatorial election.
So who is this candidate? It seems most are putting their money on the story being about Hillary Clinton and her always-at-her-side sensuous Muslim "assistant" who seems to be at her D.C. appartment early in the morning and late in the evening. Yes, the story would "out" Hillary as a Lesbian.
So why is this an issue? It may matter to some that the Clinton's have been leading a cardboard cutout simulation of a marriage but many have suspected that for years. The danger -- at least to the country -- would be on how far Hillary and Co. would go to cover up the truth. Imagine her as President and a foreign country quietly letting her know that they had indisputable proof that she was in fact a lesbian, information they were prepared to go public with, unless, of couse she did ... A. B. C. You get the idea. I am reminded of the KGB and their tactics on luring U.S. government officials to spy for the Soviets. They had an acronym: MICE. M- for money; I- for ideology, C - for coersion and E- for ego. Could a foreign intelligence service blackmail Hillary Clinton concerning her Lesbian tendencies? Did China blackmail Bill Clinton?
What do you thing?