About Me

Name: JDHoldem
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

LA Times and Candidate Sex Scandal

It seems that the Los Angeles Times is "supposedly" sitting on a steamy sex scandal involving a major Presidential candidate. According to the rumor, this is a well-known open secret among the Washington Press Corp. Apparently The Times is cogitating over the ethical issues involved with the story and the impact it would have on the election -- even though they apparently had no such reluctance concerning Arnold and sex stories about him -- releasing stories only days before the gubanatorial election.
  So who is this candidate? It seems most are putting their money on the story being about Hillary Clinton and her always-at-her-side sensuous Muslim "assistant" who seems to be at her D.C. appartment early in the morning and late in the evening. Yes, the story would "out" Hillary as a Lesbian.

So why is this an issue? It may matter to some that the Clinton's have been leading a cardboard cutout simulation of a marriage but many have suspected that for years.  The danger -- at least to the country -- would be on how far Hillary and Co. would go to cover up the truth. Imagine her as President and a foreign country quietly letting her know that they had indisputable proof that she was in fact a lesbian, information they were prepared to go public with, unless, of couse she did ... A. B. C. You get the idea. I am reminded of the KGB and their tactics on luring U.S. government officials to spy for the Soviets. They had an acronym: MICE. M- for money; I- for ideology, C - for coersion and E- for ego. Could a foreign intelligence service blackmail Hillary Clinton concerning her Lesbian tendencies? Did China blackmail Bill Clinton?

What do you thing?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Will the 2008 Presidential Election be a Blowout? For the GOP??

Today a California Field Poll came out giving some encouragement that California will not be easy for Hillary Clinton and the Dems in the Presidential election. California has been considered practically a lock for the Blue State Lovers, but things are becoming fluid. Remember, this is the state of the Governator, who has become very popular again in his own right.

So let's do a little surmising, shall we? Let's say that the GOP nominee is Rudy. I know, I know, it's a bit premature. But just for the heck of it, let's put Rudy at the top of the ticket. That puts NY in play. It gives the GOP a real good shot at Florida. Rudy should run a lot better than a leftist candidate such as Clinton in the deep South. Put Texas in the GOP column.

And now, perhaps, California?? Wow!!  And then there are the not-so-widely discussed issues, the ones whipsered between office cubicles or in hushed tones over a lunch counter.  The "Woman" factor. I know, we've been hearing how woman are going to flock to the polls to cast their votes for Hillary. That's the Dem party line, but it's not anchored to reality. Here is what is more likely to happen. GOP woman vote enmass against Hillary. These are thinking woman, woman who are strong, and in no way beholden to a quasi-socialist form of government. They are smart and they see exactly the kind of creature they are dealing with in Hillary. In fact, I think woman can size her up much better than men. Follow this up with the man who says he has no problem voting for a woman, then goes in and pulls the lever for Rudy because he has a gender bias. Or the independent who is inclinded to vote Dem, but sits this one out because he/she can't bring themselves to vote for someone with an R in front of their name, but will have nothing to do with the one of the most power-hungry, corrupt politicians of the last one-hundred years.

And, of course, if the Dem primaries get really rough and tumble, Clinton could have more battle scars than a glass cutter's hands with no gloves.  

Chin up. Things are going our way!!

 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Why is Keith Olberman Soooo Gutless??

Does anyone actually watch this guy? Based on his ratings, probably not many. In the name of fairness, I've forced myself to watch snippets of his show now and then. Frankly, he's such a self-absorbed pompous talking head, the average person can take about as much of him as they can Cyan Pepper -- in extremely small doses.

Here is my problem with his "show" -- He is in constant froth mode against the president. I just don't mean he's in disagreement with the adminsitration. No, he works himself up into some kind of psychsis . When he hits on a topic, he goes into a rant. Then he brings on a guest. Now one might think he's bringing on a guest to represent a counter-opinion. Noooo. Mr. Spittle-Spray essentially brings on the guest to continue the bashing. Last night he goes into a bash-rant, eyes wide with mania, then brings on a guest -- from the Huffington Post. Yeah. So much for fair and balanced!

I'm frankly embarrased for the guy. He actually believes he has something to say, yet probably can't figure out why reruns of the Weather Channel are getting better ratings. Keith, here is a hint -- try interviewing someone who isn't going to suck up to you. Show some balls! Maybe grow the mustache back.

Look at your competetors and see why they are stomping all over you. O'Reilly -- notice he goes mano a mano! Hannity and Colmes. You notice anything, Bushy Brows?

Over and over and over you see this kind of intellectual cowadice from the guy.  If he doesn't have the guts to contend with someone who disagrees with him, he really needs to go back to calling Little League Baseball games in Redondo Beach, CA.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »